On November 29, 2016, the Forest Service issued a "Draft Decision Notice" to approve a special use permit allowing the Navy to install mobile electronic emitters within the Olympic National Forest as part of the Navy's electronic warfare range training activities on the Olympic Peninsula. The comment period ended on January 13. To read the comments that were submitted click the button. 

Voices Navy vet speaks of excessive jet noise West enders say "no" to military expansion Sit-In Protest in Port Townsend  Click on STOP's brochure above for more information and to download a copy to share with others. Your tax-deductible donations keep us going! Mail to STOP PO Box 3133
Port Angeles, WA
98362 or use the
Paypal button below.

Click on the Growler
for the Navy's

Proposal documents

Find STOP on Facebook

Sign Up for Updates
Save The Olympic Peninsula Current News & Views Demand that Olympic National Forest not allow the Navy a Permit for an Electronic Warfare Range. Sign the National Parks Conservation Association's petition here.


Navy Issues Draft EIS for More Growlers

NOTE: Comment Period Extended to February 24


In late November, 2016, the US Navy released its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) on the proposed addition of 36 more Growler aircraft at NAS Whidbey Island. The Navy currently flies 82 Growlers with 12 more as backup at the base. A total of 153 Growler jets have already been funded and are scheduled to all be at Whidbey by sometime in 2017.


The DEIS calls for an increase in the number of air field operations at Whidbey's Ault Field of up to 38,700 each year.  It is not immediately clear how many of these operations will be operating over the Electronic Warfare Range, where the Navy has previously promised an increase of only 10% over its historical level of 1250 flights per year.


Numerous citizens on the North Olympic Peninsula have complained about the current noise levels and the frequency with which these aircraft fly. So far, these complaints seem to have fallen on deaf ears. For a real view of how these thunderous jets affect real people see this article just published in Seattle Met. And this is before the huge increases called for by the DEIS.


STOP has discussed these issues in previous communications.  Many of you submitted comments questioning the justification for this increase after the Navy's scoping session in 2014.


Now is the time for you to raise your voices again.

 Click here to submit your comments in writing.









Navy’s Plan to Increase ‘Growler’ Operations

Draws Criticism, Promise of Legal Challenge


The Navy’s recently announced plans to increase ‘Growler’ jet training over Whidbey Island has drawn fire from one citizen organization, led to the formation of another, and prompted the Town of Coupeville to hire their own noise experts to scrutinize the Navy’s plan.


The Navy plans were outlined in a required Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that is supposed to have studied the potential impacts of its planned expansion and identified alternatives for public consideration and comment. The Navy did not begin its self-conducted environmental study until after Growler operations began.


“The Navy’s actions violate our democratic principles and harm the very people the Navy is sworn to protect,” said Ken Pickard, President of Citizens of Ebey’s Reserve. COER has been at the forefront of efforts to halt Navy Growler operations that have become a source of complaints from communities throughout the Puget Sound. Growler noise impacts in Central Whidbey have already created what one health expert labeled a “public health emergency.”


The Navy’s “Preferred” alternative for expanding Growler Operations would:


• Increase low-level training operations at its Outlying Field (OLF) near Coupeville from 6,250 operations a year to 35,100 - almost a 600% increase.


• Increase noise footprints and expose up to 3,446 children to greater than 65 dB DNL– which research shows to cause decreases in learning, reading, comprehension, cognitive abilities with a host of other adverse health and behavioral impacts. The noise can interrupt classroom learning up to 45 times per hour. (Navy DEIS.)


• Increase Growler operations from North Whidbey Island and noise impacts over Port Townsend, Anacortes and San Juan Islands – including Lopez Island where more than 5000 complaints were registered on a Growler noise ‘hot-line.’


• Increase impacts on Deception Pass State Park, where Growler noise drives away visitors at a loss of $1000 a day in park fees alone. (Seattle Times)


All of the Navy’s ‘alternative’ scenarios will increase noise, health harms and other adverse impacts. The Navy’s “no action alternative” would continue Growler operations that currently expose people in homes, schools, parks and businesses to noise that exceeds community standards set by the State of Washington, the EPA, the Occupational and Health Administration (OSHA), and the World Health Organization.


“Asking citizens to choose from the Navy’s list of alternatives is like asking us which club we want to be beaten with,” said COER member Bob Wilbur. “The Navy's desired number of flyovers will force homeowners to sell their unlivable properties at huge losses.”


According to COER, the Navy’s Environmental Study is flawed by design, in part, because the Navy did not take a single real-time measurement of noise experienced by communities. Instead, the Navy used unreliable computer modeling that averaged periods of noisy over-flights with days of silence when jets did not fly.  National noise experts say this is an invalid misuse of the noise metric.


The National Park Service recently completed a sound study of Growler noise impacts over Ebey's Landing Historic Reserve and concluded that Growler noise is a problem requiring serious attention.

Because of Navy Growlers, the once peaceful Reserve is now the loudest National Park in the Nation.


The Navy will issue a final Environmental Impact Statement and decision after it ‘considers’ public comments on the Draft EIS. The National Environmental Policy Act only requires the Navy to seriously study potential harms and alternatives. However, the Navy can still choose the most harmful action alternative.


COER is urging the public to reject all of the Navy’s proposals and has vowed to continue its political and legal efforts to oppose Growler operations over populated and environmentally sensitive areas.




P.O. Box 202, Coupeville, WA 98239